[RPL/2] Downloading actual version

[Felix Becker]

Am Sonntag, den 18.11.2007, 01:06 +0000 schrieb Felix Becker:
> Am Samstag, den 17.11.2007, 14:09 +0100 schrieb BERTRAND Joël:
> > > 	rpl.h contains an illegal sequence but I don't understand why I never 
> > > see it on my test server... When you build a RPL/2 from scratch, you 
> > > convert all files in src directory to avoid encoding troubles, and I 
> > > don't think why src/rpl.h was broken. I have fixed it, I'm trying to 
> > > build a new RPL/2 from sources. If build process ends without error, I 
> > > shall upload a new tarball as soon as possible.
> > 
> > 	Fixed in
> > 
> > http://www.systella.fr/~bertrand/rpl2/download/rpl-4.0.0.prerelease.2.tar.bz2
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> But, sth. strange now. A simple "LANG=C ./configure" (and also without
> LANG=C) produces this now:
> 
> 
> === configuring in tools/units-1.86
> (/home/felics/download/RPL2/rpl-4.0.0.prerelease.2/tools/units-1.86)
>   configure: running /bin/sh ./configure '--prefix=/usr/local'
>   --cache-file=/dev/null --srcdir=.
> checking for cl... cl
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
>   compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' for more details.
> configure: error: ./configure failed for tools/units-1.86
> 
> 
> Attached the config.log and tools/units-1.86/config.log.

I suspect the problem is that I have a programme called "cl" installed,
but it is not a C-compiler but it will start some common lisp. Hm, you
probably should check for this, too (i.e. if cl is a C-compiler or not).
With removing all cl-stuff from confugure.ac and configure in
tools/units-1.86/ it configures.


But I get still the same error from make all:

"
make[2]: *** Keine Regel vorhanden, um das Target »rpl.xpm«,
  benötigt von »all«, zu erstellen.  Schluss.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/felics/download/RPL2/rpl-4.0.0.prerelease.2/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/felics/download/RPL2/rpl-4.0.0.prerelease.2'
make: *** [all] Fehler 2
"

It seems like there is a make-target "rpl.xpm" referenced but not
defined. Unfortunately I am not familiar with make.

Ciao,
Felix.