[FreeVMS] Question about FreeVMS qemu image

Renee rmctwo at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 15:31:51 CEST 2013


" But I wouldn't recommend to continue with Bliss."

Why not? 

Renrr

-----Original Message-----
From: FreeVMS [mailto:freevms-bounces at rayleigh.systella.fr] On Behalf Of
Roar Thronæs
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 5:49 AM
To: FreeVMS mailing list
Subject: Re: [FreeVMS] Question about FreeVMS qemu image

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:20:09PM -0400, Matthew Veety wrote:
> 
> Bliss doesn't look terribly hard to parse. We could write one. It could
output gas or nasm syntax. Compilers aren't a big deal to write. 

I did implement sufficient parts to be enable to compile for 32-bit the
CMUIP telnet client. (64-bit was not possible without many changes.)

It is included in the source for FreeVMS 0.3.x.

(And how come features like these are still unknown?
Strange...)

But I wouldn't recommend to continue with Bliss.

--
-Roar Thronæs
_______________________________________________
FreeVMS mailing list
FreeVMS at rayleigh.systella.fr
https://www.systella.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freevms




More information about the FreeVMS mailing list