[RPL/2] did i found a bug ?

[BERTRAND Joel]

DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre a écrit :
> 100 1024* 50 *

	Yes, you have.

RPL/2> 100 1024*

2: 100
1: '1024*'
RPL/2> 50 *

2: 100
RPL/2>

	I shall investigate as soon as possible. The same error can be obtained 
with :

2: 100
1: '1024*'
RPL/2> 23 +

and some other functions. I'm sure (but I haven't tested yet) that the 
same bug remains in '-', '/' and '**'.

	Regard,

	JKB