[FreeVMS] New enthusiast.
Roar Thronæs
roart at nvg.ntnu.no
Sat Jun 10 16:56:59 CEST 2017
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:56:51AM +0200, Guido wrote:
>
> The x86_64 support of the 2.4.18 linux kernel was lacking at best (would
> have required a 2.6.x kernel at least). I agree that upgrading the
That's is why I took some code from a newer kernel.
> kernel makes little sense though (did investigate it some time ago, but
> discarded the idea). This means that with FreeVMS 0.3.x we are
> essentially stuck with (virtual) i386 based hardware. Though that should
> not be a problem for adding most VMS functionality, it would be a lot
> more appealing to develop for more contemporary hardware. Adding x86_64
> support is no small task either, because that bounds on developing some
> bare bones OS.
There is support for 64-bit, but with some more instability.
(The disk images I provide are also 64-bit.)
> >So I would go for 1. continue the 0.3.x branch unless someone with a lot
> >of competence and a lot of time show up.
>
> Continuing the FreeVMS 0.3.x branch will be a lot of work too. In its
> present state it seems to be thrown together without much consideration
> for design, making it difficult to comprehend.
Possibly, because it evolved.
(I would not have been able to do it otherwise.)
Anyway, developing and continuing any OS is a lot of work :)
--
Regards,
-Roar
More information about the FreeVMS
mailing list