[FreeVMS] Status update
BERTRAND Joel
joel.bertrand at systella.fr
Thu Apr 30 09:51:18 CEST 2009
Roar Thronæs wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:24:11AM +0200, BERTRAND Joel wrote:
>> I think that we have to talk about dark side of this project. You
>> have done some stuff, but there is no documentation to help you. With a
>> centralized documentation, I think we should make more development. We
>> need to assign tasks to contributers too. For example, I have not time
>> enough to try to understand your development, but I have some time to
>> write some subroutines or libraries. I think we can find some new
>> contributers if we can propose different tasks. That beeing said, I
>> think we have to analyze differences between both kernels to merge these
>> kernels if it is possible.
>
> I have done some comments in doc/internals, but it is not much.
Yes, I know. I have seen this directory for a long time. Main problem
(for me, but I'm pretty sure I'm not alone...) is that it's impossible
to help you and write some code with this documentation. I think that we
have to write an exhaustive documentation, and a documentation that
describe all subroutines and all features (that are or shall be added)
of FreeVMS kernel.
> I regard books about VMS Internals, Linux kernel internals, CPU docs etc
> as necessary for doing things, and would take a lot of time duplicating it.
I understand, but even if you use VMS internals books, you try to write
some VMS-compatible API. VMS internals books and linux documentations
don't describe FreeVMS kernel. I think that without any _real_ and
_exhaustive_ documentations, we cannot help you.
Regards,
JKB
More information about the FreeVMS
mailing list